This article discusses the use of slang during the highly publicized London riots of the past few weeks. I find a few things interesting here. One is related to the link between language and national identity. Here, there seems to be pushback against the amount of American slang terms used by the rioters, as if acknowledging that certain terms used come from U.S.culture implicates the rioters as less linked to local, London issues. Second, I see an instance of language serving as proxy, as we have politicians noting the use of slang that comes from hip hop, rap, and a general “gansta” U.S. culture (they even spelled it gangsta! /r/ vocalization) as evidence that the “gangsta” lifestyle imported to U.K. youth is to blame for the riots. To me this communicates an unspoken racial/ethnic/class condemnation for the riots, but rather than say “we blame lower class, non-white London youth who are violent and glorify violence,” what is said is “they say ‘po-po’ and ‘feds,’ which means they are “gangsta.”
What do you think?
- CoLang 2018
- Lecturer in Phonology, UC Berkeley
- Cascadia Workshop in Sociolinguistics
- UNC-Chapel Hill Linguistics MA Program
- Student Input Requested – Ling 312
- Brandeis University Master’s Program in Computational Linguistics
- 10/5 at 4:30: Yu Lha, “My Language Revitalization Journey”
- LoL: now also the Lounge of Linguistics!
- Lab Manager Position @ Johns Hopkins
- Department of Linguistics at the University of Maryland
Get Notified about New Posts