{"id":2736,"date":"2016-11-09T19:06:15","date_gmt":"2016-11-10T03:06:15","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.reed.edu\/alan\/?p=2736"},"modified":"2021-10-11T23:02:05","modified_gmt":"2021-10-12T06:02:05","slug":"reeds-climate-path-under-trump","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.reed.edu\/alan\/2016\/11\/reeds-climate-path-under-trump\/","title":{"rendered":"Reed&#8217;s Climate Path under Trump"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>(<strong>Update<\/strong>: On 11 Oct 2021 the Reed College Board of Trustees announced its decision to divest the college&#8217;s endowment from fossil fuels. Read about it <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.reed.edu\/alan\/2021\/10\/reed-announces-plan-for-fossil-fuel-divestment\/\">here<\/a><\/strong>.)<\/p>\n<p>The election of Donald Trump to the presidency raises all sorts of questions about future US policy on greenhouse gases and climate change. An opinion piece by Robert Stavins (<a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/interactive\/projects\/cp\/opinion\/election-night-2016\/goodbye-to-the-climate\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><strong>&#8220;Goodbye to the Climate,&#8221;<\/strong><\/a> NY Times, 9 Nov 2016) lists the promises that Trump made on the campaign trail: rescinding all actions by the Obama administration, stopping all US funding for all UN climate-related activities (this would include funding for the IPCC?), stopping all work on reducing greenhouse gases (including reversing EPA regulations to date), and restoring the US coal industry.<\/p>\n<p>If this list sounds like a horrific prospect, consider this: the Obama administration&#8217;s regulations to date have not brought us anywhere near meeting our obligations under the Paris agreement. A recent analysis published in <a href=\"http:\/\/nature.com\/articles\/doi:10.1038\/nclimate3125\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><strong>Nature Climate Change<\/strong><\/a>, and reported in <a href=\"http:\/\/www.sciencemag.org\/news\/2016\/09\/united-states-will-miss-paris-climate-targets-without-further-action-study-finds\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><strong>Science<\/strong><\/a> magazine (26 Sept 2016), states, &#8220;Even if the United States implements all current and proposed [Obama administration] policies, it would miss its 2025 target by as much as 1.5 billion metric tons of carbon dioxide per year\u2014roughly 20% of the nation\u2019s total emissions.&#8221; 20% is a pretty big &#8216;miss,&#8217; especially when we remember that it is 20% of the gases <a href=\"https:\/\/www.epa.gov\/ghgemissions\/global-greenhouse-gas-emissions-data#Country\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><strong>emitted by the world&#8217;s second largest producer of greenhouse gases<\/strong><\/a>. It is certainly not the kind of outcome that anyone who is concerned about climate change can tolerate.<\/p>\n<p>Which raises this question: if a Trump administration fails to act on climate, or rolls back\/looks the other way on existing regulations, what responsibility do institutions like Reed College have? Do we just close our eyes (<a href=\"http:\/\/www.reed.edu\/news_center\/press_releases\/2013-2014\/071714_ffrletter.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><strong>as the Reed trustees have done in the past<\/strong><\/a>) and pursue whatever activities and investments the law allows because climate change is a &#8216;political&#8217; issue? I sincerely hope not. Whether Reed&#8217;s trustees like it or not, we may be entering a period when conviction must finally translate into action.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px\"><strong>Nov 22, 2016 update<\/strong> &#8211; Science magazine (14 Oct 2016, p. 154) <a href=\"http:\/\/science.sciencemag.org\/content\/354\/6309\/152.full\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><strong>reports<\/strong><\/a> &#8220;<strong>401<\/strong>\u00a0&#8211; Lowest concentration of carbon dioxide, in ppm, measured for 2016 at Mauna Loa in Hawaii in late September, before values climb again. The site may now have passed the 400-ppm marked\u00a0<span style=\"text-decoration: underline\">permanently<\/span>.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>(Update: On 11 Oct 2021 the Reed College Board of Trustees announced its decision to divest the college&#8217;s endowment from fossil fuels. Read about it here.) The election of Donald Trump to the presidency raises all sorts of questions about&nbsp;&hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.reed.edu\/alan\/2016\/11\/reeds-climate-path-under-trump\/\">finish&nbsp;reading&nbsp;Reed&#8217;s Climate Path under Trump<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":55,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[19],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2736","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-climate-change"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.reed.edu\/alan\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2736","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.reed.edu\/alan\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.reed.edu\/alan\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.reed.edu\/alan\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/55"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.reed.edu\/alan\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2736"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.reed.edu\/alan\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2736\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3410,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.reed.edu\/alan\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2736\/revisions\/3410"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.reed.edu\/alan\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2736"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.reed.edu\/alan\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2736"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.reed.edu\/alan\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2736"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}