{"id":687,"date":"2010-12-29T08:12:31","date_gmt":"2010-12-29T16:12:31","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/wordpress.reed.edu\/alan\/2010\/12\/what-do-faculty-do.html"},"modified":"2014-03-18T10:14:40","modified_gmt":"2014-03-18T17:14:40","slug":"what-do-faculty-do","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.reed.edu\/alan\/2010\/12\/what-do-faculty-do\/","title":{"rendered":"What is expected from academic scientists?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Prof. Allan Bard, a highly respected chemist, scientist, author, and teacher at the University of Texas, recently contributed an editorial titled <a href=\"http:\/\/pubs.acs.org\/cen\/editor\/88\/8841editor.html\"><strong>&#8220;It&#8217;s Not the Money, Stupid!&#8221;<\/strong><\/a> to the American Chemical Society&#8217;s weekly magazine C&amp;E News (Oct. 11, 2010). He begins with:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>&#8220;<strong>The culture<\/strong> of academic research has shifted over<br \/>\nthe past 50 years from research evaluation based on teaching,<br \/>\ncreativity, and productivity to one based simply on the amount of money<br \/>\n(often now called &#8220;resources&#8221;) raised. A number of factors have played a<br \/>\nrole in this change: the &#8220;business model&#8221; for universities, an<br \/>\nincreased willingness to accept greed as a virtue in our society and as a<br \/>\nmeasure of success, and a desire for an easy &#8220;objective&#8221; measure of<br \/>\nsomething that is otherwise difficult to quantify.<\/p>\n<p>As a result, we have reached the point where faculty members are<br \/>\njudged more by the amount of research funds they have raised, primarily<br \/>\nfrom government agencies, than by the accomplishments that flow from the<br \/>\nfunding. Obtaining high levels of funding is considered not only<br \/>\ndesirable, but absolutely necessary, and I&#8217;ve been party to tenure<br \/>\ndiscussions that have centered on this (for example, on the need for<br \/>\n&#8220;scoring two major grants&#8221;) rather than on the quality of work.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>To my surprise, these comments have raised more than a few hackles and C&amp;E News felt compelled to present both sides in a <a href=\"http:\/\/pubs.acs.org\/cen\/government\/88\/8850gov2.html\"><strong>&#8220;Point\/Counterpoint&#8221;<\/strong><\/a> (Dec. 13, 2010). Which raises the question, what is expected from academic scientists?<br \/>\n<!--more-->This question has different answers at different institutions. An undergraduate college like Reed presumably expects its faculty to focus on teaching to a much greater degree than a research university does, but expectations everywhere seem to be shifting towards research, even at Reed. For example, recent changes in the College&#8217;s sabbatical program are clearly designed to reward successful researchers.<\/p>\n<p>Prof. Bard worries about the corrosive effects of money on research and how it changes the perceptions of future scientists. He writes, &#8220;No wonder we have problems with attracting good young people to careers<br \/>\nin academic science despite large outreach efforts. If working closely<br \/>\nwith students and doing long-term fundamental research is not the goal<br \/>\nand money is the important thing, there are more lucrative professions<br \/>\nthan academic ones for them to pursue.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>In the Point\/Counterpoint, Profs. Glenn Prestwich and Charles Wight take another view. They claim that &#8220;a new generation of faculty entrepreneurs has emerged: We identify and<br \/>\nsolve real-world problems, translate basic research into applied<br \/>\ntechnology, and create products as well as publications. We understand<br \/>\nthe importance of market pull, and we have learned the business of<br \/>\nscience. Rather than teaching only to the 5% who will become professors<br \/>\nand physicians, we provide real-world skills to the 95% who will go on<br \/>\nto become politicians, business owners, writers, and company scientists.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>This last part about teaching &#8220;real-world skills to the 95%&#8221; seems rather fanciful to me. What useful real-world skill does a future politician discover in a chemistry course? When I crack open the latest editions of chemistry textbooks or examine chemistry course descriptions in university catalogs, I can&#8217;t find any evidence of the &#8220;business of science&#8221;. What Prestwich and Wight describe as &#8220;translational teaching&#8221; simply doesn&#8217;t exist at the undergraduate level, no matter who is doing the teaching (and one might argue that it doesn&#8217;t exist at the graduate level either, at least not in any organized fashion). It would be a tragedy if university\/college administrators embraced an entrepreneurial model for faculty scientists in the expectation that it will give students more &#8220;real-world skills&#8221; or a better understanding of the &#8220;business of science&#8221;.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Prof. Allan Bard, a highly respected chemist, scientist, author, and teacher at the University of Texas, recently contributed an editorial titled &#8220;It&#8217;s Not the Money, Stupid!&#8221; to the American Chemical Society&#8217;s weekly magazine C&amp;E News (Oct. 11, 2010). He begins&#8230; <a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.reed.edu\/alan\/2010\/12\/what-do-faculty-do\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":55,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-687","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.reed.edu\/alan\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/687","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.reed.edu\/alan\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.reed.edu\/alan\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.reed.edu\/alan\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/55"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.reed.edu\/alan\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=687"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.reed.edu\/alan\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/687\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2286,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.reed.edu\/alan\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/687\/revisions\/2286"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.reed.edu\/alan\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=687"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.reed.edu\/alan\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=687"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.reed.edu\/alan\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=687"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}