{"id":5917,"date":"2017-01-05T17:18:18","date_gmt":"2017-01-06T01:18:18","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.reed.edu\/chem201202\/?p=5917"},"modified":"2017-01-05T17:18:18","modified_gmt":"2017-01-06T01:18:18","slug":"retrieval-practice-protects-your-memory","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.reed.edu\/chem201202\/2017\/01\/retrieval-practice-protects-your-memory\/","title":{"rendered":"Retrieval Practice Protects Your Memory"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>A <a href=\"http:\/\/science.sciencemag.org\/content\/354\/6315\/1046\" target=\"_blank\"><strong>new&nbsp;article<\/strong><\/a> in Science magazine from <a href=\"https:\/\/ase.tufts.edu\/psychology\/people\/thomas\/\" target=\"_blank\"><strong>Prof. Ayanna Thomas&#8217;<\/strong><\/a> research group is one that every O Chem student should look at. The article doesn&#8217;t contain any chemistry, but it contains some potentially valuable insights into becoming&nbsp;a more successful O Chem student.<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<p>The article&nbsp;is titled&nbsp;<a href=\"http:\/\/science.sciencemag.org\/content\/354\/6315\/1046\" target=\"_blank\"><strong>&#8220;Retrieval practice protects memory against acute stress&#8221;<\/strong><\/a>&nbsp;(Smith et al., Science, 25 Nov 2016, <strong>DOI<\/strong> 10.1126\/science.aah5067) and describes scientific evidence that you can build stronger memories of words and images if you go about it the right way.<\/p>\n<p>The authors introduce their study by pointing to numerous studies that show stress impairs memory retrieval. There is also evidence&nbsp;that the stress hormone, <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Cortisol\" target=\"_blank\"><strong>cortisol<\/strong><\/a>, affects brain regions that are connected with retrieval of memories.<\/p>\n<p>The authors then comment on different strategies that people use to encode (make) memories. These strategies include reading the words or images&nbsp;over and over again (&#8220;<strong>rereading<\/strong>&#8221; or &#8220;<strong>restudying<\/strong>&#8220;), constructing mental images to accompany words and&nbsp;images (&#8220;<strong>mental imagery<\/strong>&#8220;), drawing diagrams&nbsp;that show relationships between concepts one wants to recall (&#8220;<strong>concept mapping<\/strong>&#8220;), converting lists of items into short-hand abbreviations or mnemonics (&#8220;<strong>keyword mnemonic<\/strong>&#8220;), and simply trying to recall as many items from a list as possible, either in writing or orally (&#8220;<strong>retrieval practice<\/strong>&#8220;). The authors point to research that says, although rereading\/restudying is often the method-of-choice reported by people who have been given a memorization task, it is a poor learning strategy because it creates relatively weak memories. Retrieval practice, which you might view as &#8220;giving yourself a practice test,&#8221; seems to produce memories that are as strong, or even stronger, than those achieved with other study techniques.<\/p>\n<p>The authors, therefore, decided to investigate for themselves whether retrieval practice was superior to rereading\/restudying, and also whether memories that were built using these techniques responded differently to the corrosive effects of stress.<\/p>\n<p>The study described in the article involved 120 participants who were divided into two groups, a restudy (SP) group and a retrieval practice (RP) group. Each participant was expected to memorize&nbsp;60 items, 30 words (nouns) plus 30 images (of nouns). The SP&nbsp;group was allowed to look at (&#8220;restudy&#8221;) the 60 items a second time, while the RP group was asked to test themselves by writing down as many items as they could recall in a fixed amount of time (&#8220;practice tests&#8221; were&nbsp;not graded so RP participants never&nbsp;learned whether&nbsp;they had written down correct items or what they had left out). Finally,&nbsp;both groups were divided again into a control set (non-stressed) and a &#8220;stressed&#8221; group (read a detailed&nbsp;description of the methodology&nbsp;<a href=\"http:\/\/science.sciencemag.org\/content\/sci\/suppl\/2016\/11\/22\/354.6315.1046.DC1\/aah5067-Smith-SM.pdf\" target=\"_blank\"><strong>here<\/strong><\/a>), and the participants were tested to see how many items&nbsp;they could recall.<\/p>\n<p>The researchers found that:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>SP participants, the ones who got to look at the list a 2nd time, actually recalled <em>fewer<\/em> items than RP participants, the ones who took an ungraded practice test. <strong>Conclusion #1:<\/strong> RP is a superior method for making memories;<\/li>\n<li>Stressed SP participants recalled fewer items than non-stressed SP participants. <strong>Conclusion #2:<\/strong>&nbsp;the corrosive effect of stress on memories is real, at least for the SP participants;<\/li>\n<li>Stressed&nbsp;RP participants recalled more items than all SP participants (stressed and non-stressed) and essentially gave the same performance as non-stressed RP participants. <strong>Conclusion #3:<\/strong>&nbsp;RP learning builds memories that resist stress.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>Application to O Chem<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Self-testing retrieval practice&nbsp;is simple and straightforward. Suppose your notes for a chapter list&nbsp;5 nucleophiles that react with alkyl halides (or 5 reagents that oxidize alcohols, or 5 catalysts for hydrogenating alkenes), instead of reading this list over and over again (rereading), you should engage in retrieval practice (RP) by <em>giving yourself a simple test<\/em>: draw as many of the 5 nucleophiles as you can. If you can only draw 3 nucleophiles, go back to your notes to find the 2 missing items, then test yourself again. Once you can pass the test (draw all 5), work on something else for awhile, and then come back a little later and give yourself another &#8220;nucleophile&#8221; RP test.<\/p>\n<p>You can also make this a little more elaborate with good effects: test yourself by trying to draw 5 <em>reactions<\/em>, where each reaction uses a different&nbsp;nucleophile, and each reaction shows a chemical equation with reactants and products.<\/p>\n<p>Or, step it up a little more, draw 5 <em>mechanisms<\/em>. Or, rank the 5 reactions in terms of speed. With a little imagination, you&nbsp;can practice &#8220;retrieval&#8221; with almost any type of O Chem information.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Closing thoughts<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>After Smith et al. published their article, Science published&nbsp;a little pushback from some advocates of concept mapping. Here are links to this&nbsp;<a href=\"http:\/\/science.sciencemag.org\/content\/334\/6055\/453.3\" target=\"_blank\"><strong>comment<\/strong><\/a>, and to Smith et al.&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/science.sciencemag.org\/content\/334\/6055\/453.4.full\" target=\"_blank\"><strong>response<\/strong><\/a>.<\/li>\n<li>4 years earlier&nbsp;Science had published an article that compared retrieval practice to &#8220;elaborative studying with concept mapping&#8221; and found that retrieval practice was superior. See&nbsp;<strong><a href=\"http:\/\/science.sciencemag.org\/content\/331\/6018\/772\" target=\"_blank\">&#8220;Retrieval Practice Produces More Learning than Elaborative Studying with Concept Mapping&#8221;<\/a><\/strong> (Karpicke &amp; Blunt, Science, 11 Feb 2011, <strong>DOI<\/strong>&nbsp;10.1126\/science.1199327)<\/li>\n<li>Want to see more Chem 201_202 posts about study habits? Select&nbsp;<strong>Study habits &amp; Distractions<\/strong> from the&nbsp;<strong>Categories<\/strong> menu in the sidebar. (A &#8220;tag&#8221; word cloud is on its way&#8230;)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A new&nbsp;article in Science magazine from Prof. Ayanna Thomas&#8217; research group is one that every O Chem student should look at. The article doesn&#8217;t contain any chemistry, but it contains some potentially valuable insights into becoming&nbsp;a more successful O Chem student.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":55,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[10],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5917","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-study-habits-distractions"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.reed.edu\/chem201202\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5917","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.reed.edu\/chem201202\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.reed.edu\/chem201202\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.reed.edu\/chem201202\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/55"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.reed.edu\/chem201202\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5917"}],"version-history":[{"count":12,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.reed.edu\/chem201202\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5917\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5929,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.reed.edu\/chem201202\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5917\/revisions\/5929"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.reed.edu\/chem201202\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5917"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.reed.edu\/chem201202\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5917"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.reed.edu\/chem201202\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5917"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}