{"id":70,"date":"2008-11-05T01:05:49","date_gmt":"2008-11-05T09:05:49","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/wordpress.reed.edu\/chem201202\/2008\/11\/bromonium-ions.html"},"modified":"2014-03-18T10:13:06","modified_gmt":"2014-03-18T17:13:06","slug":"bromonium-ions","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.reed.edu\/chem201202\/2008\/11\/bromonium-ions\/","title":{"rendered":"Bromonium ions"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Here are pictures of the models that I shared with you in class on Monday. They address different issues.<\/p>\n<p><b>Model #1 &#8211; A Stable Bromonium Ion.<\/b> A bromonium can be stabilized by placing large groups around the alkene. These groups offer steric hindrance to the bromide anion so that <b>backside attack<\/b> can&#8217;t occur.<\/p>\n<p>Notice that the &#8220;alkene&#8221; carbons in the reactant lose their planar geometry when bromine bonds to them. This geometry change pushes the bulky substituents downward where they block the path of any nucleophile that approaches from the backside. Since this also increases the exposure of the frontside of these carbon atoms, you might regard the stability of this ion as further evidence that SN2 reactions require backside attack.<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"\"><a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.reed.edu\/chem201202\/files\/bin\/L23.110308%20stable%20bromonium%20ion.jpg\">View image<\/a><\/span> <\/p>\n<p><b>Model #2 &#8211; Unsymmetrical alkene leads to unsymmetrical bromonium ion, plus SN1-SN2 ring-opening.<\/b> An unsymmetrical alkene like Me2C=CH2 produces a geometrically distorted bromonium ion like the following:<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" alt=\"L23.110308 unsym bromonium ion GEO.jpg\" src=\"https:\/\/blogs.reed.edu\/chem201202\/files\/bin\/L23.110308%20unsym%20bromonium%20ion%20GEO.jpg\" style=\"margin: 0pt auto 20px;text-align: center\" width=\"290\" height=\"287\" \/><\/span>Notice that one CBr bond is much longer than the other, 2.39 v. 1.99 A. A normal CBr single bond is 1.95 A, so one bond in the bromonium ion is almost &#8220;normal&#8221; while the other is considerably weaker.<\/p>\n<p><!--more-->We explained the distorted geometry by pointing out that 1) it<br \/>\nreduces angle strain around the CH2 carbon, and 2) it is accompanied by<br \/>\na shift in electron density from the more substituted carbon to bromine<br \/>\n(which is, after all, the more electronegative atom). This leaves the<br \/>\nmore substituted carbon with a partial positive charge which is<br \/>\nstabilized by the two methyl groups (hyperconjugation + polarization).<\/p>\n<p>Another<br \/>\nway to look at this structure is to say that bromine is starting to<br \/>\n&#8220;leave&#8221; the more substituted carbon without waiting for a nucleophile<br \/>\nto replace it, i.e., the geometry is beginning to approach that of an<br \/>\nSN1 transition state. However, to dislodge the bromine completely, the<br \/>\nnucleophile must enter from the <b>backside<\/b>, which is reminiscent of an SN2 transition state. Hence, we might call this an &#8220;SN1-SN2 reaction&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>It<br \/>\nis important to remember that this odd behavior is due to the<br \/>\nunsymmetrical substitution pattern in the alkene. If both carbons are<br \/>\nsubstituted, the intermediate is less distorted and a mixture of<br \/>\nproducts might result.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Here are pictures of the models that I shared with you in class on Monday. They address different issues.Model #1 &#8211; A Stable Bromonium Ion. A bromonium can be stabilized by placing large groups around the alkene. These groups offer&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":55,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-70","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-post-lecture"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.reed.edu\/chem201202\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/70","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.reed.edu\/chem201202\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.reed.edu\/chem201202\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.reed.edu\/chem201202\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/55"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.reed.edu\/chem201202\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=70"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.reed.edu\/chem201202\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/70\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5207,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.reed.edu\/chem201202\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/70\/revisions\/5207"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.reed.edu\/chem201202\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=70"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.reed.edu\/chem201202\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=70"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.reed.edu\/chem201202\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=70"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}