{"id":259,"date":"2012-09-01T10:45:53","date_gmt":"2012-09-01T17:45:53","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/wordpress.reed.edu\/politika\/?p=259"},"modified":"2014-03-18T10:10:22","modified_gmt":"2014-03-18T17:10:22","slug":"pants-on-fire-politics-can-be-an-argument-and-a-tactic","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.reed.edu\/politika\/2012\/09\/01\/pants-on-fire-politics-can-be-an-argument-and-a-tactic\/","title":{"rendered":"Pants-On-Fire Politics can be an argument AND a tactic"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I can&#8217;t agree with Ben Smith about &#8220;pants on fire&#8221; politics. \u00a0Smith writes &#8220;Democrats attack on \u00a0Republican honesty is a campaign ploy, not an argument.&#8221; \u00a0He denies a charge of &#8220;cynical postmodernism,&#8221; but I think this is precisely what Smith is engaging in.<\/p>\n<p>The background, of course, is Paul Ryan&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/gopconvention2012\">acceptance speech<\/a> at the convention, and the litany of <a href=\"http:\/\/thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com\/2012\/08\/30\/in-ryan-critique-of-obama-omissions-help-make-the-case\/?hp\">fact-checks<\/a>that followed.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft\" src=\"http:\/\/blog.lib.umn.edu\/hutch213\/myblog\/liar-liar-pants-on-fire.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"234\" height=\"175\" \/>Following close on the heels is Ryan&#8217;s claim that he ran a sub 3:00 marathon, whereas it turned out his actual time was <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nydailynews.com\/blogs\/running_dialogue\/2012\/09\/paul-ryan-did-not-run-a-sub-3-hour-marathon-runners-world-sleuthing-digs-up\">over four hours<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Ok, I get it, the last one has nothing to do with politics. \u00a0But anyone who has run a marathon will tell you that they know within a minute, if not a second, what they ran. And the difference between a sub 3:00 marathon, which only a small percentage of runners ever meet (for the record, my own personal best is 3:00:33), and 4:01 is tremendous. \u00a0It reveals, if nothing else, a tremendous amount of braggadocio if not an ability to rewrite history.<\/p>\n<p>But I&#8217;m more interested in Smith&#8217;s claim that the focus on deception is somehow a distraction from what a &#8220;real&#8221; campaign should be about: policy proposals and policy differences. \u00a0The problem is that the American public have not been fully informed about the policy options that are in front of them.<!--more--><\/p>\n<p>Thomas Riehle writes about &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/today.yougov.com\/news\/2012\/07\/19\/magical-thinking-about-federal-budget\/\">Americans Magical Thinking About the Budget<\/a>.&#8221; \u00a0Larry Bartels shows how Americans views of economic growth are strongly influenced by partisan bias, often <a href=\"http:\/\/today.yougov.com\/news\/2012\/03\/12\/our-own-facts\/\">overwhelming the facts<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Unlike Smith, I think the story of Janesville was an obvious distortion. \u00a0Ryan can&#8217;t blame Obama for failing to support a deficit reduction plan that he himself voted against (and as all the coverage points out, Ryan was central in solidifying GOP opposition).<\/p>\n<p>Pointing this out is a campaign tactic, to be sure, but that doesn&#8217;t also mean it cannot also be an argument about the willingness of a campaign to fess up to the record of its nominees and the implications of its proposals.<\/p>\n<p>Personally, I&#8217;d love to see a genuine debate in this election about the future of entitlements and Medicare. \u00a0I think we should debate whether or not Social Security benefits should be taxed (I believe they should).<\/p>\n<p>I don&#8217;t hold out much hope, however, if the media are going to let candidates\u00a0<span style=\"text-decoration: underline\">from either party<\/span> off the hook when they say things that are blatantly false or even misleading.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I can&#8217;t agree with Ben Smith about &#8220;pants on fire&#8221; politics. \u00a0Smith writes &#8220;Democrats attack on \u00a0Republican honesty is a campaign ploy, not an argument.&#8221; \u00a0He denies a charge of &#8220;cynical postmodernism,&#8221; but I think this is precisely what Smith &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.reed.edu\/politika\/2012\/09\/01\/pants-on-fire-politics-can-be-an-argument-and-a-tactic\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":38,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[10,9,12,7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-259","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-faculty","category-paul-gronke","category-political-commentary","category-voting-and-elections"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.reed.edu\/politika\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/259","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.reed.edu\/politika\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.reed.edu\/politika\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.reed.edu\/politika\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/38"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.reed.edu\/politika\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=259"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.reed.edu\/politika\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/259\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":571,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.reed.edu\/politika\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/259\/revisions\/571"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.reed.edu\/politika\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=259"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.reed.edu\/politika\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=259"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.reed.edu\/politika\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=259"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}