Did the data tell your story?

You responded on the board. By adding to the board, you offered a piece of information — data about yourself — and collectively created a dataset. Anyone walking by the board, including yourself, could view and “access” that data. One challenge with data for research is that not all of it is public, open, or accessible, though different movements nowadays are calling for accountability and transparency in data collection and sharing.

Even though you contributed to a dataset, there could be many possible flaws or issues with the data that could in its worst form be devastating for you and your communities.

What do you notice about the questions that were asked? What about the categories of food? Is that the only way people have categorized food? What kinds of food are missing? Who do you think answered the questions (what are the demographics)? Does it represent the community? Does it represent you?

By identifying existing data-driven narratives that align, or don’t, with our lived experiences and naming gaps in available information, we can start to define and create new datasets that let us tell the full stories of our communities

Opening Data Zine, page 9

Read this excerpt from the Opening Data Zine for an example documenting “retail redlining”:

Remember that data is read by humans with biases, and those biases inform how people understand data and how they attribute value, or interpret, that data, such as looking for data to back up held beliefs or pre-made claims. Also, some data sources, such as the well-known census, can be skewed in other ways, with some groups or communities underreporting and being undercounted (for various reasons). Covid-19 proved a critical moment for collecting health data on marginalized and underrepresented populations that weren’t readily available before.

Interested in learning more about data research? Check out these resources:

Love Data Week 2024‘s theme is “My Kind of Data” and is all about data equity, inclusion, and creating a kinder world through data.

Library Lobby Survey results: “Do you prefer print books or ebooks? If ebooks, which platform?”

This week’s library lobby survey asked the question, “Do you prefer print books or ebooks? If ebooks, which platform?” with options of “Proquest”, “EBSCO”, “Taylor & Francis”, and a “Write in Response” option. Results are in!

  • Proquest: 32 votes
  • EBSCO: 15 votes
  • Taylor & Francis: 6 votes
  • Write in Response: 14 votes

Write in responses skewed towards print books, with 10 total votes, including one print vote stating “Print books 120%.” Other answers were:

-EPUB

-PDF

-Kindle

-Overdrive

  • Total: 67 votes

Library Lobby Surveys happen (almost) every Tuesday. Stop by to cast your vote and get some candy! We love to receive feedback from you all.

Library Lobby Survey results: “What is your preferred way of getting news about Library events and schedules?”

This week’s library lobby survey asked, “What is your preferred way of getting news about Library events and schedules?” with options of “twitter”, “Library homepage”, “Instagram”, “Facebook”, “Library blog”, and a write-in jar for other answers. Results are in!

  • twitter: 7 votes
  • Library homepage: 43
  • Instagram: 31 votes
  • Facebook: 42 votes
  • Library blog: 13 votes
  • Total: 136 votes
  • Write in answers ( a total of 21 votes) included 15 votes for “email/SBinfo” 3 votes for “posters/fliers”, 1 vote for “carrier pigeon”, 1 vote for “Russian bot” and 1 vote for “Walk”.

Library Lobby Surveys happen (almost) every Tuesday. Stop by to cast your vote and get some candy! We love to hear feedback from you all.