First, a confession ... I made a mistake on the answer sheet that I posted last Friday. The very first problem asks for the reaction product of HI + 1-butene in the presence of peroxides. The correct (?) answer is 1-iodobutane (the anti-Markovnikov product), but I drew 2-iodobutane (the Markovnikov product) on the answer sheet. I have corrected and posted a new answer sheet, but because my readers had already marked up the homework assignments, ignore any "wrong" marks.
Second, the great physicist Albert Einstein once said something like this in reference to theories of physics, "Everything should be made as simple as possible, but no simpler." The same should be said about structural formulas, resonance structures, and chemical reactions.
This assignment seems to have set a new "standard" for
stumping students and I found myself writing "please come see me this week"
messages on an unprecedented number of assignments.
First, let me talk about the "come see me" note.
The point of visiting me is quite simple - as your instructor ("study coach"),
I want to understand as much as I can about difficulties that you are having in
my course. Some difficulties are an inevitable part of the learning process.
Others might be avoided, or moderated, by engaging in different study
practices. By talking about this together, I might be able to suggest some places
where your approach can be improved. So please follow up asap on my request to "come
see me". (And if your homework doesn't contain such a note, feel free to come
see me. I like the company.)
The standard way to think about steric repulsion is very simple. An atom requires space for its electrons. If another atom intrudes on that space, both atoms are unhappy and the energy rises. Steric repulsion.
Unfortunately, concept doesn't quite match reality here. It is so costly for atoms to "overlap" (unless they are bonded, of course) that they rarely do. For example the distance between the end C in butane, C-C-C-C, is practically the same in the relatively low energy gauche conformation (3.1 A) and for the very high energy "methyls eclipsed" conformation (2.9 A). (For comparison, the distance is about 3.8 A in the anti conformation.) We know that the "methyls eclipsed" conformation is destabilized by steric repulsion, but the distance between the methyl groups is still fairly large. What's going on?
I've been inundated with questions and comments about homework assignment #1, and requests for changes in conference assignments, so I wanted to bring you up to date on these and other items of interest.
Comments on each problem follow (but not in numerical order) ...
#2 - One of the most common errors on this problem set was working the wrong problem for #2. I have to take some of the blame for this. I wrote "Learning Activity #4", but I meant "ChemActivity #4". Many of you had another idea (Learning Group Problem #4, etc.). Oh well.
Recent Comments