Two weeks ago I offered my perspectives on exam scores (Some data …, Dec 1, 2013). Since then another exam has been completed and I can provide you with the latest results:
- Exam 1 – 44 (80-100%), 17 (60-80%), 3 (below 60%), median = 42
- Exam 2 – 40 (80-100%), 17 (60-80%), 7 (below 60%), median = 42
- Exam 3 – 9 (80-100%), 25 (60-80%), 30 (below 60%), median = 30
- Exam 4 – 14 (80-100%), 20 (60-80%), 30 (below 60%), median = 31
- Exam 5 – 32 (80-100%), 22 (60-80%), 11 (below 60%), median = 39.5
These figures may differ a bit from data provided earlier in the semester because the current figures are based on the 65 students who are still enrolled in the class (we started with 71 in lecture).
As you can see, exam scores have followed the historical pattern: a slight drop from #1 to #2, a large drop from #2 to #3, and increases from #3 to #4 to #5. Of course, these statements apply only to the class as a whole; individual scores may have followed a very different pattern. Nevertheless, this pattern supports two claims that I made at the start of the semester:
- organic chemistry “catches most students by surprise” at some point, and
- nearly everyone eventually figures out a successful strategy for learning with this material
Dec 31, 2013 Update. 20 students sent me their votes for the top Improvement and top Insight reflections.
Here are the results for the top Improvement:
- familiarize ourselves with the material before class – 5 votes
- don’t skip the more difficult problems and study together outside of class – 3 votes
- set up checkpoints and rotate responsibility for bringing model kits to class – 5 votes
- establish friendly and strong communication in the group – 3 votes
- study and review together before exams – 3 votes
- stay on task and don’t “be talking about nonsense” – 1 vote
Here are the results for the top Insight (many of these were prefaced by, “the greatest surprise to me is”:
- actively engaging with the material helps me understand, but a lecture can also clarify key connections – 1 vote
- learn better by explaining things to others – 8 votes
- group work can be difficult because sometimes I am too shy to speak up and I don’t want to slow the others down – 5 votes
- genuine commitment to group work makes it more effective, everyone contributes in some form or other – 2 votes
- the ability to memorize seems to make the difference on exam and we need to find ways (e.g. mnemonic devices) that help this – 3 votes
- differences between groups can be surprisingly large – 1 vote
To read the original ground rules and the full reflections that people voted on, just keep reading.
This will sound a bit odd, but we have barely reached the middle of the semester. Obviously, I’m not referring to the calendar — the final exam is just over two weeks away — but if you count exam points, you might see what I’m driving at. So far there have been four short exams totaling 200 points. What remains are another short exam and the final exam totaling 250 points. So slightly over half of the ‘exam’ semester is still waiting.*
(*Actually way more than half for some students because of the Exam Rescue policy which allows the final exam score to also replace two short exam scores.)
This post discusses two important exam-related topics. First, it provides statistics on the scores for Exams 1-4. Second, it tells you how to assess your exam scores. Unfortunately, the section on exam assessment is fairly generic — I can’t discuss the scores of any individuals — so I urge everyone who has concerns and/or questions about their work in Chem 201 to come see me in person.
My door is open.
Reed chemistry alum and medical school student, Hassan Ghani ’08, just sent me this story from yesterday’s NY Times, “How to get an A- in Organic Chemistry” by Barbara Moran. Like so many others, Ms. Moran has decided a mid-life career change is in order, but her search for professional fulfillment has taken an unusual tack: at the tender age of 42, and with parental responsibilities for two small children, she finds herself enrolled in organic chemistry so that she can become a doctor.
Her story about the joys of “orgo” includes observations on the necessity of mastering electron pushing (draw a “zillion” curved arrows and you will eventually develop the kind of “intuition” that makes a poorly placed arrow seem as unpleasant as “ketchup on sushi”), similarities in the type of reasoning (“inductive generalization”) used by organic chemists and doctors, and the all-important life lesson that, even though our life compass points towards the Land of Perfection, it is not a place that we can ever visit.
As you prepare for Exam 3, make sure that you learn to quickly identify the roles that different molecules might play in a chemical reaction. The sooner you can decide that a molecule is probably an acid (or base, nucleophile, electrophile, solvent), and that certain atoms in the molecule are proton donors (or proton acceptors, electron donors, electron acceptors, or leaving groups), the sooner you can move on to solving the problem.
Lists of acidic functional groups have been provided, but how efficiently can you recognize basic functional groups? How about nucleophiles? (Sorrell Tables 6.2 & 6.3) Or aprotic and protic solvents? (Sorrell Figure 6.7) Sorrell’s chapters often end with a useful Reaction Summary (see p. 233-4). Here’s a link to a summary that I handed out to students in 2012. A tip for the future: as you study (this means work an activity, read the book, …), you should build your own summary of ‘things to know’. It isn’t enough to answer a couple of questions that illustrate a principle like primary RX react with Nu faster than secondary RX. You need to summarize this principle for yourself.
Mitsunobu Reaction. I didn’t say much about this reaction in class because I ran out of time, but you need to know the reaction (i.e., know how to ‘predict-plan-explain‘) for the next exam. You don’t need to know all of the subtleties of its mechanism, however. Just focus on these 3 points: What is the nucleophilic substitution step, SN1 or SN2? What is the ionization state of the Nu? What is the leaving group? There is considerable disagreement about the details of the mechanism, e.g., the steps leading to the formation of an OPPh3 leaving group. If you’re interested, compare Sorrell’s (poorly drawn) mechanism with alternative (and more plausible) mechanisms presented in Wikipedia and at the Organic Chemistry Portal.
A few of you were unable to attend last night’s lab lecture. Here are slides from the lab lecture (bonus prize: GC data for a ‘standard’ mixture of isopentyl alcohol and isopentyl acetate):
Sapling sent this announcement to me today:
Sapling Learning is committed to providing the most effective online homework and the best support in higher education. We need feedback from you and your students to make sure that we are aware of where we can improve. As a token of appreciation for your time and feedback, each instructor who completes the survey will receive a $5 Starbucks gift card. As an incentive for students, we will be giving away an Apple iPad mini to 3 students randomly selected from those who complete the survey. The student survey must be completed and submitted by November 8, 2013 to be entered to win. Student winners will be announced on November 15, 2013.
Please share this link with your students: https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/studentfall2013
We thank you and your students in advance for taking 10 minutes to complete our survey.
You can download a copy of tonight’s lecture here.
Atomic force microscopy (AFM) is a imaging technique that works on a completely different principle from optical microscopes. Instead of magnifying light waves, an AFM device passes a needle-like probe over a surface and constructs an image of the surface based on subtle variations in the strength of probe-surface forces.
AFM and related imaging techniques generated lots of buzz in the 90’s by providing images of molecules, even individual atoms, on surfaces. AFM has returned to the front page with even higher-resolution images that track the pathways electrons take in chemical bonds, even hydrogen bonds. Compare the white tracks in the AFM image (left) with the pattern of covalent and hydrogen bonds expected from the structural formulas (right) (click image to enlarge).
For an easily digested description, see “Hydrogen Bonds Visualized” in C&ENews, 30 Sept, 2013. Or check out the original research article by J. Zhang et al, “Real-Space Identification of Intermolecular Bonding with Atomic Force Microscopy” (Science, 26 Sept 2013, DOI: 10.1126/science.1242603).
Here are links to all of the molecular modeling activities we have done in class (these links also can be found on the Classes page).
- Activity #1 – Build/sketch models with Spartan ’14
- Activity #2 – Potential maps, intermolecular interactions, hydrogen bonds
- Activity #3 – Orbital shapes (atomic, molecular), HOMO-LUMO gap, electron density surfaces, charge delocalization
Links will be added as needed.